Future Landscape Forum calls for a pause in proposed changes to legislation around burning on peatlands

More News

The UK Government recently announced that burning on peatlands with peat deeper than 30 cm is to be effectively banned as a management tool for vegetation, replaced by cutting and rewetting. Defra claims that these policy changes are backed by robust science in response to the latest evidence assessments by Natural England. However, there is widespread recognition that, as most scientific focus to date has been on the impacts of prescribed burning, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the impacts of the alternative heather management tools available to moorland managers.

Recent publications clearly show that some key reports frequently misinterpret study findings, make misleading and even false statements, and lack robust evidence to support generic claims around impacts from burning, rewetting and cutting. Of particular concern is also a lack of transparency by Natural England about how the robustness of individual studies was determined during the critical appraisal process.

The FLF suggest that the intense focus on (often short-term and localised) negative aspects of prescribed burning has distorted an objective search for the best means of managing our moorland habitats into the future. This appears to be reflected in the numerous inadequate, ill-informed and sometimes opinionated, inaccurate interpretations or unverified statements made in recent reviews or related documents. Based on these concerns, which are supported by numerous published documents and submissions to Defra as part of the consultation, a pause in the proposed change to the legislation seems justified. Subsequently, an adequate, in-depth, independent and unbiased expert review assessing the evidence underpinning any changes to policy, including the quality of Natural England reports and reviews, should be conducted.

We acknowledge that good regulation and training in moorland management options can and should ensure best practice towards an outcomes-based approach. As recommended previously, a sensible approach would be an adaptive management framework, in which different management practices—including prescribed burning—are applied across sites and monitored. We hope that this document makes a valuable contribution to informing best practice in upland management and ensuring the development of evidence-based environmental policy.

You can sign the Future Landscapes Forum's position statement by clicking through to their website here.

ENDS

Notes to Editors:

The National Gamekeepers’ Organisation: The National Gamekeepers’ Organisation (NGO) represents the gamekeepers of England and Wales. The NGO defends and promotes gamekeeping and gamekeepers and works to ensure high standards throughout the profession. The National Gamekeepers’ Organisation was founded in 1997 by a group of gamekeepers who felt that keepering was threatened by public misunderstanding and poor representation. Today, there are 13,000 members of the National Gamekeepers’ Organisation.  www.nationalgamekeepers.org.uk